C is for Cookie: Convio Platform Townhall (part one of two)

Share Our Strength Cooking Matters Quiz

Author’s Note: this post is part one in a two-part series, adapted from a session by Jesse Kelsey (Donordigital) and Jason Wilson (Share Our Strength), first presented at the 2013 Nonprofit Technology Conference in Minneapolis, Minnesota. We explored unconventional solutions to work with, and around, a familiar platform, Convio (a.k.a. Blackbaud’s Luminate product).

I’ll explore two of these examples, in depth, during this short series, by highlighting some front-end coding tricks.

PART ONE: Cooking Matters Quiz

Our main goal for this quiz was to drive awareness to a study called It’s Dinnertime that Share Our Strength conducted about how low-income families plan, cook, and shop for healthy meals. The full report can be found at nokidhungry.org/itsdinnertime. The report included the full study, press events, and an infographic in addition to the quiz.

This is the “recipe” that we used as a guide for the quiz, which is a standard Convio survey with some front-end bells and whistles:

  • Turn a Convio survey into a quiz
  • Give feedback to users on quiz score
  • Make dynamic score sharing possible
  • Implement a more visually engaging design

Some of the secret ingredients used in this recipe:

  • Cookies
  • JavaScript/jQuery
  • HTML/CSS
  • HTML Captions in the Convio survey

In essence, we combined the recipe and ingredients above in order to make the Convio survey more visually engaging, and to make the survey-turned-quiz into a more interactive experience, such that visitors could take the quiz and be provided with a score, as well as dynamic sharing tools to help increase awareness around the It’s Dinnertime study.

Web browser cookies played a key role in allowing for the quiz to be scored and for the score information to be used within javascript functions on the survey confirmation page. We borrowed a javascript function, called createCookie() from Quirksmode that lives on the first page of the Cooking Matters Quiz, as well as a function called readCookie(), which resides on the thank you/confirmation page of the quiz. Quirksmode provides a great, general, tutorial on how to implement and use cookies here.

Each question on the Cooking Matters Quiz is a set of radio buttons. In order to create and update the cookies on page one of the quiz, we needed to call the createCookie() function during an onclick event. Since the Convio survey module writes the survey question HTML from the server, meaning that we didn’t have direct access to edit or rewrite the HTML, I chose to hide some sections of the HTML written by the survey module with javascript, and to rewrite the HTML inputs (radio buttons) within HTML caption sections on the survey. This allowed for the addition of inline onclick events for each question, like these: onclick=”createCookie(‘Question1′,’True’,0)” and onclick=”createCookie(‘Quesion1′,’False’,0).”

Dynamic Facebook Post

On the thank you page for the quiz, using the readCookie() function, I grabbed the current cookie information from the browser and created javascript variables, like this: var q4 = readCookie(‘Question4′);. Then, still using javascript, created some if/else statements that did the scoring. The logic worked like this: if the cookie value for question four is “Price of healthy grocery items,” score 1, else score 0. After a quick tally, a variable called “totalscore” was created and used throughout the thank you page, for dynamic Facebook and Twitter links, and feedback to the quiz takers, etc.

In the end, Share Our Strength attracted 1,138 new advocates to the cause through the quiz alone, and through a small Facebook ad campaign, had over 11 million impressions and just shy of 3,000 clicks (2,860). The quiz was a key engagement factor that helped people not only understand the content of the report without having to read it, but also gave us a way to capture more names of individuals interested in cooking skills education — a core component of Share Our Strength work.

In part two, I’ll cover one more in-depth example, which was a dynamic Twitter landing page, called “Hunger Knows No Party,” and built into the Convio Pagebuilder module.

Download the full presentation slides here, from C is for Cookie: Convio Platform Townhall, a presentation from the 2013 Nonprofit Technology Conference.

Bonus: view, dissect, and use a simple, cookied quiz recipe here.

Convio Tips & Tricks: Using session tags to personalize the constituent user experience

At Donordigital we often help our clients create personalized user experiences for their constituents. What this means in the real world is that someone receiving an email or landing on a web page will see content personalized to their location or interests.

An example is a recent email fundraising appeal for one of our clients that required us to insert the name of the constituent’s closest Federal Representative into the body of the email, thereby urging the email recipient to contact their Representative about creating more affordable housing in the United States. To accomplish this in Convio, we turned to the session tag (S-tag) which is specifically designed to allow you to personalize an email message, web page or donation page that is either hosted on or launched from the Convio platform.

The goal behind using this S-tag was to inform the constituent of their closest Federal Representative. We made use of the S93 parameter, which displays the recipient’s elected representative for their state. When implementing an email in Convio, most S-tags can be implemented by using the drop-down menus in the HTML Content Editor.

The tag syntax is:

[[S93:federal representative:text:name_______:]]

The S93 parameter will display any elected official that matches the constituent’s location. There are other choices to put in place of this option as well: President, Vice President, First Lady, U.S Senators, U.S Senator 1, U.S. Senator 2, Governor, State Senator and State Representative.

You can specify in the third piece of this tag how you want the name of the Rep to be formatted. Currently in the tag is text, which displays the name of the representative in basic inline formatting. The other three options are: List, Bulleted List and Raw.

The last piece of this tag has many options and what’s currently being triggered is Name. This displays the Full Name of the representative. The other options are: First and Last Names, Title and Full Name, Title and First and Last Names, Title and Last Name and No Name.

Give the S93 tag a try when you need to send out an appeal revolving around any kind of political advocacy campaign.

Cemal Richards is a Web Developer at Donordigital, the online fundraising, marketing, and advertising company.

Announcing the 2013 IMAB Integrated Marketing Award winners

On Saturday, April 13,2013, at the Nonprofit Technology Conference awards luncheon, the Integrated Marketing Advisory Board (IMAB) which Donordigital participates in, announced the winners of its second annual Integrated Marketing Awards. The Integrated Marketing Awards recognize nonprofit organizations showing exemplary leadership in the area of integrated marketing.
  We congratulate this year’s winners, who exemplify the sector’s use of integrated, multi-channel marketing campaigns or programs.

Winners by Category:

The Donor

Canadian Cancer Society in Saskatchewan won in the category of The Donor for demonstrating how an integrated marketing campaign or program had an impact on donor satisfaction and the donor experience. The organization committed to integrate every campaign in 2012 so that no event or campaign was conducted through a single channel only. Donors were encouraged to participate as volunteers and advocates, and advocates and volunteers were encouraged to donate.

The Organization

The Ontario SPCA and British Columbia SPCA, both leading animal welfare organizations in their respective provinces, won in the category of The Organization, demonstrating how an effort across the organization aligned strategy, structure, culture, or skills to impact the organization’s ability to integrate its marketing efforts. The organizations worked together to share management, expenses, marketing and work in bringing a successful fundraising event from Australia to Canada.

The Practice

The American Diabetes Association, an organization leading the fight against the deadly consequences of diabetes and fighting for those affected by diabetes, won in the category of The Practice for sharing its real world case study highlighting best practices in the field of integrated marketing. The organization quickly spun up a highly integrated “Giving Tuesday” campaign around their Step Out: Walk to Stop Diabetes walk.

The IMAB is privileged to honor these organizations that are demonstrating best practices in the field of integrated marketing. We’ll feature case studies from these organizations in future posts, so stay tuned for more details!

Eric Overman is the Vice President for Digital Strategy and Integrated Services at Donordigital, the online fundraising, marketing, and advertising company.

Share Our Strength crowdsources School Breakfast Week

Last month, Donordigital worked with Share our Strength to raise national awareness about childhood hunger during School Breakfast Week (March 4-8).

The No Kid Hungry Starts with Breakfast Campaign reminded us all 21 million kids in the US receive free or reduced-price school lunch, but only half of those kids get school breakfast, even though they are eligible. School breakfast provides significant immediate and long-term impact on children in need: for example, kids who eat school breakfast miss less school and do better in math, and they earn $10,000 more annually as adults.

Through a unique crowdsourcing tool, the campaign gathered data about schools throughout the country serving school breakfast, inviting local residents to call their school to ask three questions, and then input the information online.

Donordigital developed a Web page to allow visitors to download and share the infographic, which included an integrated donation widget to easily accept online gifts.

Wendy Marinaccio is a Senior Account Executive at Donordigital, the online fundraising, marketing, and advertising company.  Contact: wendy@donordigital.com

What’s wrong with the nonprofit sector in America?

Assume you’re responsible for raising all the money for a nonprofit organization. (Maybe you are!) Then consider the following questions:

  • Are you bringing in all the funds necessary not just to meet your organization’s budget this year, plus modest year-to-year growth, but enough money to grow at a dynamic pace—so the organization can take giant steps toward realizing the visionary goal on which it was founded (curing cancer, ending hunger, eliminating poverty, achieving nationwide free arts education)?
  • Are you and your senior colleagues earning salaries commensurate with those of corporate executives performing comparable work?
  • Are you raising sufficient funds to underwrite an intensive marketing and public relations program to build your brand, raise your organization’s public profile, and keep the organization top of mind among your constituents?
  • Is a significant portion of your budget—5% or 10%—devoted to research and development, enabling you to test new markets and new fundraising approaches without fear of failure?

I suspect your answer to these questions is: No.

My answer is: Why not?

In the remarkable video below, a 19-minute TED Talk, Dan Pallotta explains why you should be able to answer Yes—and what’s keeping you and your colleagues in the nonprofit sector from having the impact your organization would need to bring about lasting, long-term change. Unfortunately, Pallotta has received a great deal of abuse for airing these views. So far as I’m concerned, he should receive the nonprofit sector’s equivalent of a Nobel Prize for spelling out what’s wrong with the nonprofit sector.

This video is longer than you may be used to, but it’s worth viewing from start to finish. Look, listen, and learn:

Mal Warwick is founder and chairman of Mal Warwick | Donordigital and the author of numerous books on fundraising. His most recent, How to Write Successful Fundraising Appeals, Third Edition, will be available this summer.

The power of storytelling is in all of us

Our team at Donordigital is buzzing about this wonderful video and discussion guide on storytelling published by Lean In, a global community committed to offering women the encouragement and support for their ambitions.

Storytelling seems to be going through a resurgence these days and it’s well deserved. Storytelling is as old as direct response fundraising itself. At its core, storytelling is about putting a human face and an emotional narrative behind an issue, so that numbers and programmatic activities can come to life with drama and personality.

The specific story in this video is about the very important issue of bone marrow transplants in Asia, and the narrator Jennifer Aaker, Professor of Marketing at the Stanford Graduate School of Business, does a wonderful job describing how storytelling played a critical role in harnessing human energy to solve a real medical challenge.  As you keep watching, Dr. Aaker shares some instructive insights into the art, science and power of storytelling.

We learned a long time ago in the direct response business that a personal story that tells an organization’s story is often the best way to persuade supporters to join a cause and to become a donor.  That’s one of the reasons why those direct mail letters are so long — because we’re so busy trying to weave a tale that will pull in the reader.

In the online world, we also use storytelling to get supporters and donors excited about a cause.  Sometimes that takes the form of a multi-part email campaign that stretches over several weeks or months to bring the reader along in the experience of solving real world problems.  We also like to use photographs, videos, interactive maps, special website landing pages, and infographics to draw in the viewer more deeply into the content.  And as always we’re thinking — how can we engage our supporters in an authentic and powerful manner to understand this issue more deeply and personally?

So, watch this video and download the discussion guide, and learn to tell stories that advocate your ideas and bring others along with you.

Dan Doyle is the President and CEO of Mal Warwick | Donordigital

Measuring your ROI in multichannel fundraising campaigns

In our newly evolving multichannel nonprofit fundraising environment, the old methods of measuring return on investment have clearly begun to fall apart.  Today’s nonprofit fundraiser can choose from a multitude of channels to invest in – and each channel can have different cost structures and produce different types of donors and returns.

This complexity makes it even more critical to be able to understand – and measure – the return on your fundraising investments (ROI), so that you can make data-driven investment decisions across channels or across a combination of channels.  The following four steps, detailed in Donordigital’s Measuring Your Return on Investment in Multichannel Fundraising Campaigns, will help you measure return on investment across multiple fundraising channels.

STEP 1: ESTABLISH THE GOAL

Fundraising efforts can have benefits far beyond dollars for a nonprofit organization.  In spite of the capabilities for multichannel fundraising efforts to engage individuals to become advocates, activists or volunteers, it is recommended that – for the purpose of calculating return on investment for fundraising efforts – the following standard should be used: The goal of fundraising investment is to produce revenue in the form of donations that have cash value.

Of course, this doesn’t mean you should never invest in efforts that can’t be measured, or that you must produce equivalent revenue in all channels.  But it does mean you should make those investment decisions after you have prioritized and optimized investments you know will have a measurable return.

STEP 2: START WITH THE “I” IN ROI – DEFINE YOUR INVESTMENT

To be completely accurate in measuring fundraising investment, you would need to count and distribute the costs of a thousand different items – the cost to turn the lights on every morning, the salaries of everyone on your staff, the money you paid for the sandwiches at your last brainstorming retreat.

However, calculating expenses to that level of detail is not feasible given the limited time and resources available to most fundraising programs. Therefore, consider the following two standards in determining levels of fundraising investment across channels:

1. Count the direct costs of initial and subsequent efforts.

Direct costs should include all expenses incurred specifically to make the effort possible.  Examples of direct costs include:

  • The cost per contact for a phone campaign
  • The cost of paper, printing, list rental and postage for mail efforts
  • Online advertising and list rental costs

2. Count only those indirect expenses that are outside your usual cost of business.

A robust fundraising program incurs many costs that are not directly attributable to any one effort. But most of these expenses can be considered a cost of doing business, independent of any single fundraising effort. You will not take down your organization’s website, throw away your database or stop thanking individuals for gifts if you decide not to perform a new donor acquisition effort this fall.  Therefore, taking the extra effort to assign these expenses across different fundraising efforts is most likely not worth the effort – and will not help you make strategic decisions about which channel to invest in.

STEP 3: UNDERSTAND THE “R” IN ROI – CALCULATE YOUR RETURNS

Based on step one above, the calculation of returns becomes a whole lot easier. Because your goal is to raise dollars, the return on your investment is simply the dollars you raise.  As with tracking costs above, this can be done most easily at the donor or prospect level through the following steps:

1. Assign an origin effort to every donor or prospect you acquire.

This should be the effort that first identified the individual as a likely donor to your organization.  It could be an online action based on a click through from a banner ad or a piece of return mail from a direct mail acquisition effort.

2. Measure all initial and subsequent revenue from that donor or prospect.

This would include all direct gifts made by the individual, including the initial gift to your organization.

STEP 4: MEASURE THE MULTICHANNEL RETURN ON FUNDRAISING INVESTMENT

Once you have measured your investment and determined your return, measuring ROI is easy.  Simply divide total revenue returned by the total of the initial and subsequent costs.  You can measure this ROI as a percentage – with 100 percent ROI meaning you have gained a dollar for every dollar you spent. Or it can be phrased in terms of dollars – for every $100 you spent, your return in donations is $100.  Here is an example:

  • You spend $10,000 on an online campaign that acquires 5,000 new prospects.  Over the next 12 months, you send these prospects 25 emails at $0 expense, two phone campaigns that cost $4.50 per contact for 500 contacts, and three direct mail campaigns at $0.50 each. That means your total expense is $10,000 + $0 + ($4.50 x 500) + (3 x 5,000 x $0.50) = $19,750.
  • Over the same 12 months, 250 of the 5,000 prospects convert to donors, giving a total of $21,250.
  • The ROI for the online campaign = $21,250/$19,750, or 108%.  In other words, for every dollar you spent, you raised $1.08.

Measuring ROI in this way means rigorously tracking all of your campaigns and donors, and being able to assign costs and revenue to the proper effort.  However, to determine how much money to invest across competing channels, it is impossible to make the right decision without doing this legwork.  And, in today’s environment, it is imperative to measure return on investment in an equal way across all fundraising channels in order to ensure the long-term health of your organization.

This article was originally printed in Philanthropy Journal.

Peter Schoewe is Director of Analytics at Mal Warwick|Donordigital.  Schoewe brings over 15 years of direct mail and multi-channel fundraising expertise to explore how best to optimize integrated fundraising programs.

Convio Quiz Cookie Recipe

Yum, it's a cookie

With some creativity and the use of standard front-end code, a bland online survey can be sweetened and transformed into an engaging, interactive, and shareable quiz that keeps advocates energized around a cause.

Our client Share Our Strength engages constituents online using Convio fundraising software in service of their mission to end childhood hunger in America.

Convio has a handy set of tools and can wrangle lots of data in meaningful ways on the backend, but creating a default survey experience for constituents can leave nonprofit advocates and donors hungry for a little bit more. We at Donordigital worked with Share Our Strength to create a quiz experience that would offer all the bells and whistles to deeply engage people with Share Our Strength’s mission.

When Share Our Strength released It’s Dinnertime: A Report on Low-Income Families’ Efforts to Plan, Shop for and Cook Healthy Meals, we worked together to create this short “Cooking Matters” quiz with the goal of increasing mission awareness and promoting the report.

During the implementation for this quiz, which is a survey that is built on top of the Convio platform, we encountered several desired features that we couldn’t quite make happen with the features in Convio. One example is the lack of a straightforward way to score the quiz in order to give the constituent immediate feedback.

So we turned to a more front-end approach and created a few cookies on the quiz page, in order to read those cookies and do more fun stuff with them on the thank you page. Then, on the survey thank-you page, we were able to score the quiz, highlight the answers, create some dynamic sharing features, and, generally, sweeten up the user experience.

Here is a quick cookie recipe, if you’d like to try this yourself at home:

Convio Quiz Cookie Recipe:

  • Include a javascript function to createCookie() on the quiz page (this is the best resource I’ve found to date on implementing cookies).
  • Call the createCookie() function to set a cookie when a quiz answer is selected. It looks kind of like this on a survey question in Convio:
  • Include a javascript function to readCookie() on the thank you page of the quiz.
  • Define some variables on the thank you page and read the cookies. That looks like this:
  • Use the javascript variables to add up scores, display answers, create dynamic share descriptions, etc.
  • To view the code (you can—since it’s front-end code), take the quiz and see what’s happening when you view > source in any web browser.
  • Enjoy!

Jesse Kelsey is a Web Developer at Donordigital, and will be speaking at NTEN’s upcoming (April 2013) Nonprofit Technology Conference in Minneapolis, MN. Look for his session, called “C is for Cookie: Convio Platform Townhall.”

Best Practices for Mobile-Friendly Email Design

When designing for mobile optimization, it is important for the design to be easily resized for various widths from desktop width (about 640 pixels across) to mobile width (about 320 pixels across). Thus, designs need to be as fluid and flexible as possible. Below are some standards and practices we have found that work best for rendering emails on both mobile screens and desktop monitors.

  • A mobile optimized layout, because of its limited width, is best reduced to a single column. This means that the traditional desktop email layout (which often features large, photographic images and multiple sidebars) renders horribly on a mobile device, often with elements and multiple columns rendering as a confusing jumble. Additionally, the mobile browser often resizes photographic images, creating a loss of image quality and text legibility.
  • Mastheads need to be as clean, simple, and straightfoward as possible for resizing. This is best achieved by having a single logo or simple image, less than 300 pixels wide, be the sole occupant for the space.  Or, alternately (but not recommended) the logo can be placed in tandem with a short “live-text” headline using a “universal” font (such as Arial, Helvetica, Verdana, Times, Georgia, or Courier).
  • Sidebars, if absolutely necessary, also need to be as clean and as simple as possible. Because we need the layout to be as fluid as possible, a solid background color and/or a single, solid, hairline border are strongly recommended over gradient or image backgrounds. The sidebar should be less than 280 pixels wide, so that it rests comfortably within the smaller 320 pixel mobile width. Keeping your sidebar on the slim side also means that your sidebar image won’t need to be resized and suffer from a subsequent loss of quality. Sidebars ideally stack above the main copy on mobile screens and, in a sense, become a sort of masthead with a headline and call-to-action up front. Because of this, it is recommended that sidebars be kept copy light and as succinct as possible.
  • Borders are often used to wrap around entire email messages. In a mobile-optimized environment, these work best as a thin hairline of a single solid color (again, avoiding gradients or images).
  • The rounded corners often seen in web and email design elements are not recommended because of cross-browser incompatibility and errors in rendering in the slimmer, mobile environments.

In conclusion, because of the wide array of monitor and screen sizes in both desktop and mobile environments, your email templates need to be simple and flexible. Because mobile and desktop emails are not separate entities, but rather one email that adapts differently when rendered on different devices, your templates need to have simple mastheads that fit to any size screen, a single, slim sidebar that can stack above or below the main body copy, and as few extraneous design embellishments as possible.

This all said, simple does not mean designs can’t be attractive and attention grabbing. In a world where we are increasingly bombarded with information and visual stimuli, designs that are simple and elegant tend to cut through the clutter much more effectively than designs that are ornate or busy. For an email message to be successful (both in and out of the mobile environment), it is better to keep your layouts simple and elegant than to loose an audience due to clutter or poor browser rendering.

Examples

Mobile-Friendly Desktop Example with SidebarMobile-Friendly Mobile Example with Sidebar
Click thumbnails to zoom

Anthony Blair Borders is the senior web designer at Donordigital, the online fundraising, marketing, and advertising company. Contact: anthony@donordigital.com or (510) 473-0368.

Kick-start Your Donation Page Optimization Efforts: Test These 7 Emerging Techniques

To improve your odds of raising more money online in 2013, most organizations would be well served to dedicate more time and resources to donation page testing.

But a greater commitment to testing is no guarantee of better results. The fact is, not all things on your donation page matter for conversion. To get statistically significant improvement, you need to focus making changes your visitors actually care about.

Below is a list of 7 emerging techniques on donation pages that we think do matter for conversion. All were in evidence during the recent year-end giving season—and focus on changes that improve usability or increase the perceived value of giving relative to its perceived cost.

Consider incorporating some of these ideas into your testing program for 2013:

  1. Shorter pages:More 2-column forms are replacing long, 1-column forms in order to make the giving process appear shorter and simpler, and bring the donate button above the fold.Example: Earthjustice (click screenshot to enlarge)



  2. Multi-step donation processes in which each step is short and super-focused:This technique can involve breaking up the giving process into bite sized pieces across multiple pages, or merely coding the steps to unfold as the user progresses through a sequence of micro-decisions, as in the case of the Obama Campaign.For this tactic to succeed (in testing or otherwise), it’s essential that your software platform is able to consistently load each step without delay.

    If page load times are at all sluggish in a multi-step process, this technique could backfire in a big way, since any delay increases user frustration and contributes to higher page abandonment.

    Example: Charity Water (click screenshot to enlarge)



  3. Donation page supplants the homepage on Dec 31st:This pushy tactic goes one step further than a splash page call to action for year-end giving; it puts a donation form in front of the visitor before they’ve expressed any desire to donate.But if there’s one day of the year it might make sense to remove one click from the online giving process, that’s December 31st –a day in which a huge portion of your site traffic seeks to accomplish this one task.

    The caveat with this technique is that there’s no set of comparable conditions for testing outside of December 31st. Surely, this technique would backfire at any other time, when site visitor intentions are not so homogenous.

    Even a brief stint of testing on December 31st is a level of risk that many organizations are probably unwilling to endure, given the stakes. But for those brave enough to try even for a few hours, it’s likely to yield valuable insights.

    Example: Feeding America (click screenshot to enlarge)



  4. Embedded video to express mission impact & successes from the year:This technique can be very effective if the video has a high production value with content that’s on point for your audience. Generally speaking, videos that work for fundraising feature poignant imagery, emotionally resonant music, tight editing, and a clear call to action.But while a well-produced video can be a powerful motivator, it’s essential that the video doesn’t serve as the sole vehicle for your message. Your call to action and value proposition for giving still need to be summarized on the donation page apart from the video. This ensures that all visitors have a positive user experience, regardless of whether they watch your video.

    Example: Share Our Strength (click screenshot to enlarge)



  5. Large, hard-hitting images with very brief copy:A powerful image can deliver greater emotional impact than a copy-intensive page. This is especially true if your cause has charismatic beneficiaries (e.g. jaguars, puppies, children). Image-driven pages can also produce a more streamlined giving process since they’re devoid of clutter.Of course, this isn’t an equal opportunity tactic. Some nonprofit causes look much better in photos than others. If your work doesn’t lend itself to this technique, consider #6 below.

    Example: Save the Children (click screenshot to enlarge)



  6. No photos:This tactic isn’t new or surprising for causes that have a difficult time expressing the value of their work in images (e.g. civil liberties groups), but we’ve also noticed this trend on the donation pages of groups whose work does provide great opportunity for visual reinforcement (international relief orgs).While the wrong photo (e.g. one expressing no value or that looks staged) can surely backfire, I question the wisdom of removing photos when a cause has strong visual assets to employ. The only way to know for sure is to test it!

    Example: AmeriCares (click screenshot to enlarge)



  7. No detours:To keep visitors tightly focused on the main call to action, donation page wrappers are stripped of global navigation and visible links to other parts of the website are removed. Typically only the brand ID is linked to the homepage.While this technique has been in use for several years, we’ve noticed that it’s becoming much more widespread on donation pages for larger organizations.

    Example: PETA (click screenshot to enlarge)